Comments on: King James http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/ Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:02:29 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: andy http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-47 andy Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:03:30 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-47 Sorry haha! Sorry haha!

]]> By: Ken http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-46 Ken Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:29:18 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-46 Doh!!! Doh!!!

]]> By: andy http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-45 andy Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:51:08 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-45 Guess we're not Presbyterian then! Guess we’re not Presbyterian then!

]]> By: Ken http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-44 Ken Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:39:29 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-44 Children's Church. Children’s Church.

]]> By: rostock http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-43 rostock Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:11:35 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-43 whoop! I guess Heidi never logged out of wordpress! whoop! I guess Heidi never logged out of wordpress!

]]> By: rostock http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-42 rostock Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:11:11 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-42 Is she obviously not a Presbyterian because they have Children's Church or because she would ask such a question!? Is she obviously not a Presbyterian because they have Children’s Church or because she would ask such a question!?

]]> By: Ken http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-41 Ken Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:45:35 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-41 A small girl in the children's church (obviously not a Presbyterian) had questions about Jesus being "born of a virgin". "Do they mean the Virgin Mary or the King James Virgin?" A small girl in the children’s church (obviously not a Presbyterian) had questions about Jesus being “born of a virgin”.

“Do they mean the Virgin Mary or the King James Virgin?”

]]> By: rostock http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-40 rostock Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:31:29 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-40 For most it is just tradition. Luther's translation is based on the Textus Receptus, same as the KJV. Evenso, some are distracted by the fact that the Amish community reads Luther's Bible. This is not a crucial "doctrine", which is why I mainly blew it off in my post. For most it is just tradition.
Luther’s translation is based on the Textus Receptus, same as the KJV. Evenso, some are distracted by the fact that the Amish community reads Luther’s Bible.

This is not a crucial “doctrine”, which is why I mainly blew it off in my post.

]]> By: Andy http://rostock.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/king-james/#comment-39 Andy Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:56:41 +0000 http://rostock.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-39 This really goes deeper than "Jesus spoke KJ English". Deeper than the Southern Baptists and Fundamentalists who push the KJB even know. It goes back to the Textus Receptus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_receptus For those who see the KJV as the only "authorized version" and who are theologically grounded, this is the real issue. The fact that the KJV used the Textus Receptus is the real issue. This really goes deeper than “Jesus spoke KJ English”. Deeper than the Southern Baptists and Fundamentalists who push the KJB even know. It goes back to the Textus Receptus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_receptus

For those who see the KJV as the only “authorized version” and who are theologically grounded, this is the real issue. The fact that the KJV used the Textus Receptus is the real issue.

]]>